The CRAI of the University of Rosario and open science

A case study

Authors

  • Marisol Edith Viracachá Reyes Independent consultant
  • Nubia Mateus Zorro Universidad de los Andes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59057/iberoleon.20075316.202238500

Keywords:

libraries, Open science, policies, funding, services

Abstract

The Learning and Research Resources Center (CRAI, for its acronym in Spanish) of Universidad del Rosario has been recognized as one of the pioneers in the promotion of open science. This paper presents the case of the center: its experience and support to open science, through its services and the implementation of resources such as the institutional repository of research data; for this purpose, the topics of open science, funding, as well as policies and manifestos are previously contextualized. In addition, the topic of libraries and open science —from the environment of services, competencias and librarian profiles— is analyzed. The results show that several factors have influenced CRAI to successfully support open science in its institution; among those that stand out is the leadership, which is reflected in the construction of collaborative networks with all university departments and the presence of components such as: institutional culture around open science, institutional open science policy and constant funding; this has allowed it to always remain at the forefront.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong, M., Davis, M., Dworak, E., Paul, Y. e Shook, E. (2021). Research Data Management Competencies Self-Assessment. Data Management Services, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.18122/dataservices.8.boisestate.

Ayris, P. (2021). “The Future Depends on What You Do Today”: The Library as a Leader in Open Science. En V. Fernández-Marcial y L. González-Solar (Eds.), Cases on Research Support Services in Academic Libraries (pp. 25-51). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4546-1.ch002.

Bagchi, M. (2018, 7-9 agosto). Open Science for an Open Future [conferencia]. Exploring the Horizons of Library and Information Sciences: From Libraries to Knowledge Hubs, Bangalore, India. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340492653_Open_Science_for_an_Open_Future.

De Giusti, M. R. (2022). Ciencia abierta: el corazón del problema. Informatio, 27(1), 309-335. https://doi.org/10.35643/Info.27.1.3.

Federer, L. M. y Qin, J. (2019). Beyond the data management plan: Expanding roles for librarians in data science and open science. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 529–531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.82.

Grossmann, A. y Brembs, B. (2021). Tasas de mercado actuales para servicios de publicación académica [versión 2; revisión por pares: 2 aprobados]. F1000Research. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.27468.2.

Larivière, V., Shu, F. y Sugimoto, C. (2020, 12 de marzo). El brote de coronavirus (COVID-19) resalta serias deficiencias en la comunicación científica [Publicado originalmente en el LSE Impact Blog en marzo/2020]. SciELO en Perspectiva. https://blog.scielo.org/es/2020/03/12/el-brote-de-coronavirus-covid-19-resalta-serias-deficiencias-en-la-comunicacion-cientifica/.

Letrouit, C., Cachard, P. Y., Dupuis, M. y Froment, B. (2021). La place des bibliothèques universitaires dans le développement de la science ouverte. Inspection générale de l’éducation, du sport et de la recherche. https://www.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/fr/la-place-des-bibliotheques-universitaires-dans-le-developpement-de-la-science-ouverte-47671.

Lizarazo, M., Lisowska, M. y Blanco, H. (2021, 25-29 de octubre). Lineamientos institucionales sobre Ciencia Abierta: caso de la Universidad del Rosario en Colombia Abierta [ponencia]. X Conferencia Internacional Bibliotecas y Repositorios Digitales (virtual). https://submissions.istec.org/index.php/biredial-istec/article/view/156.

Manifiesto bibliotecario por la Ciencia Abierta en América Latina. (2019). Recuperado de https://docutopia.tupale.co/bibliotecariosalsenado-manifiestobibliotecario2019?view.

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. (2022, 3 de agosto). Resolución 0777. Por la cual se adopta la Política Nacional de Ciencia abierta 2022-2031. https://minciencias.gov.co/pdf/pdfreader?url=https://minciencias.gov.co/sites/default/files/politica_nacional_de_ciencia_abierta_-2022_-_version_aprobada.pdf.

Ministerio de Educación Nacional. (2002, 19 de junio). Decreto 1279. Por el que se establece el régimen salarial y prestacional de los docentes de las Universidades Estatales. Diario Oficial 44.840. https://www.mineducacion.gov.co/1780/articles-86434_Archivo_pdf.pdf.

Ochoa-Gutiérrez, J. y Uribe-Tirado, A. (2018). Ciencia abierta y bibliotecas académicas: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. IRIS - Informação, Memória e Tecnologia, 4(1), 49-69. https://doi.org/10.51359/2318-4183.2018.238911.

Ogungbeni, J. I., Obiamalu, A. R., Ssemambo, S. y Bazibu, C. M. (2018). The roles of academic libraries in propagating open science: A qualitative literature review. Information Development, 34(2), 113-121. Recuperado de https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0266666916678444.

Ponsati Obiols, A. (2019). El rol de las Bibliotecas CSIC en la Ciencia Abierta. Enredadera, 33, 3-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.20350/digitalCSIC/9861.

Ramírez, P. y Samoilovich, D. (2021). Ciencia abierta en América Latina. UNESCO. http://forocilac.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/PolicyPapers-CienciaAbierta-ES-v2.pdf.

Redkina, N. S. (2021). The Library in the Information Ecosystem of Open Science. Scientific and Technical Information Processing,48(4), 239–247. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688221040043.

Seroubian, M. (2022). Acceso abierto y ciencia abierta. Experiencia desde la gestión del repositorio institucional COLIBRI de la Universidad de la República. Informatio. Revista Del Instituto De Información De La Facultad De Información Y Comunicación, 27(1), 284-305. https://doi.org/10.35643/info.27.1.6.

Siyao, P. O., Whong, F. M., Martin-Yeboah, E. y Namamonde, A. (2017). Academic libraries in four Sub-Saharan Africa countries and their role in propagating open science. IFLA journal, 43(3), 242-255. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?-codigo=6105983.

Springer, R. (2019, 29 de julio). Counting Data Librarians. Ithaka S+R. https://sr.ithaka.org/blog/coun-ting-data-librarians/.

UNESCO. (2021). Proyecto de recomendación de la UNESCO sobre la ciencia abierta. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376893_spa.

Uribe-tirado, A. (2016). El Acceso Abierto en Colombia. Un camino. Cuadernos Fronterizos, 12(38), 33–36. http://hdl.handle.net/10495/12602.

Vicente-Saez, R. y Martinez-Fuentes, C. (2018). Open Science now: A systematic literature review for an integrated definition. Journal of Business Research, 88, 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.043.

Published

2022-09-05

How to Cite

Viracachá Reyes, M. E., & Mateus Zorro, N. . (2022). The CRAI of the University of Rosario and open science : A case study. Entretextos, 14(38), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.59057/iberoleon.20075316.202238500