Subversive fidelity theory
A proposition on believing, behaving and paradoxical ways of belonging
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59057/iberoleon.20075316.202440682Keywords:
fidelity, subversion, belief, behavior, social identityAbstract
Although often overlooked in the academy, fidelity is a critical notion for any kind of human group, whatever the size, from a simple couple to a geopolitical alliance, as it necessarily depends on it to work properly. In Social Psychology, fidelity or loyalty has mostly been approached indirectly through Social Identity Theory in a rather simplistic way: a person is considered a loyal member of a group as long as they accept all of its mainstream ideals and rules with no exception. In other words, Fidelity is thought to be inextricably linked to believing and behaving, understood in an orthodox-conformist way. By contrast, we postulate that it is possible to be faithful to a group while subverting its ideology and norms, or, to put it another way, to integrate fidelity and subversión in a paradoxical yet coherent position: subversive fidelity. There have already been similar conceptual propositions both inside and outside Social Psychology, but we delve into its distinctive features, thus laying the foundations of an initial but promising theory.
Downloads
References
Álvarez, J. & Delgado, S. (1995, February 22-26). La fides ovidiana y su resurgimiento medieval: una propuesta de traducción [The ovidian fides and the medieval reemergence: a proposition of translation] [paper presentation]. In R. Martín-Gaitero (Coord.), V Encuentros complutenses en torno a la traducción [Symposium] (pp. 225-232). Centro Virtual Cervantes V Encuentros complutenses en torno a la traducción. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7462773.
Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men; research in human relations (pp. 177–190). Carnegie Press.
Baeza, J. A. (2000). Los caminos invisibles de la realidad. Ensayo de sociología profunda sobre los imaginarios sociales [The invisible path of reality. An essay on the deep sociology of social imaginary]. Sociedad Hoy.
Burke, P. J. (2003). Relationships among multiple identities. In P. J. Burke, T. J. Owens, R. T. Serpe, P. A. Thoits (Eds.), Advances in identity theory and research (pp. 195-214). Springer.
Burnes, B. (2020). The origins of Lewin’s Three-step model of change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 56(1), 32-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886319892685.
Calin, D. (2012). Explorations autor de la notion de loyauté [Explorations on the notion of loyalty]. Enfances & Psy, 56(3), 26-34. https://doi.org/10.3917/ep.056.0026.
Carrasco, E. (2012). La subversión y los movimientos definidos desde la acción política [Subversion and social movements defined from political action]. Cisma. Revista del Centro Telúrico de Investigaciones Teóricas, 1(2), 1-16. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3960776.
Deconchy J. P. (1984). Rationality and Social Control in Orthodox Systems. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The Social Dimension. European Developments in Social Psychology (pp. 13-32). Cambridge University Press.
Deconchy, J. P. (1971). L’Orthodoxie religieuse: essai de logique psychosociale [Religious orthodoxy: an essay on psychosocial logic]. Éditions Ouvrières.
Fletcher, G. (1993). An essay on the morality of relationships. Oxford University Press.
Gadamer, H. G. (2005). Truth and method. Continuum. (Original work published 1960).
Gaither, S. E. (2018). The multiplicity of belonging: pushing identity research beyond binary thinking. Self and Identity, 17(4), 443-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2017.1412343.
Giménez, G. (1997). Materiales para una Teoría de las Identidades Sociales [Elements for a Social Identities Theory], Frontera Norte, 9(18), 9-28. https://fronteranorte.colef.mx/index.php/fronteranorte/article/view/1441.
Hameed, F. & Jubair, B. (2021). Sectarianism: nature and defining criteria. Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal, 2(3), 408-425. https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v2i3.230.
Haslam, S., Reicher, S. & Reynolds, K. (2012). Identity, influence, and change: Rediscovering John Turner’s vision for social psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02091.x.
Henriques, G. (2020). Groupthink and the evolution of reason giving. In D. Allen & J. Howell (Eds.), Groupthink in science. Greed, pathological altruism, ideology, competition, and culture (pp. 15-25). Springer.
Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty. Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press.
Hornsey, M. J. & Hogg, M. A. (2000). Assimilation and Diversity: An Integrative Model of Subgroup Relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0402_03.
Hornsey, M. J. & Jetten, J. (2004). The individual within the group: balancing the need to belong with the need to be different. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(3), 248-264. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0803_2.
Hornsey, M. J. (2016). Dissent and deviance in intergroup contexts. Current Opinion in Psychology, 11, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.03.006.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: A psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin.
Jetten, J. & Hornsey, M. J. (2014). Deviance and dissent in groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 461-485. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115151.
Jetten, J. & Hornsey, M. J. (2015). The line between conformity and resistance. The Psychologist, 28(1), 72-75. https://www.bps.org.uk/psychologist/line-between-conformity-and-resistance.
Jiménez, G. (2002). De alta lealtad. Ignacio Allende y los sucesos de 1808-1811 [On high loyalty. Ignacio Allende and the events of 1808-1811]. In M. Terán (Ed.), Las guerras de independencia en la América española (pp. 63-78). El Colegio de Michoacán-Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia- Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Entretextos
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
